Environmental Values
Environmental Values 10(2001): 523-539. doi: 10.3197/096327101129340949
This article examines an allegedly Humean solution provided by J. Baird Callicott to the problem of the is/ought dichotomy. It also examines an allegedly Humean argument provided by him for the land ethic's summary moral precept. It concludes that neither the solution nor the argument is Humean or cogent.
KEYWORDS: Hume, Callicott, is/ought dichotomy, the land ethic
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Poverty, Puritanism and Environmental Conflict. Andrew Brennan
Non-Humean Holism, Un-Humean Holism Y.S. Lo
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Non-Humean Holism, Un-Humean Holism Y.S. Lo
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values.
Reprints of this article can be ordered from the British Library Document
Supply Service or ingenta
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
1 Strond
ISLE OF HARRIS, HS5 3UD
Tel: +44 1859 520204