Environmental Values
Environmental Values 12(2003): 471-487. doi: 10.3197/096327103129341414
Future generations do not exist, and are not determinate in their make-up. The moral significance of future generations cannot be accounted for on the basis of a purely individualistic ethic. Yet future generations are morally significant. The Person-Affecting Principle, that (roughly) only acts which are likely to affect particular individuals are morally significant, must be augmented in such a way as to take into account the moral significance of Homo sapiens, a holistic entity which certainly does exist. Recent contributions to Environmental Values by Alan Carter and Ernest Partridge are criticised (but not entirely rejected).
KEYWORDS: Future generations, person-affecting principle, individualistic ethics, holistic ethics
REFERENCES to other articles in Environmental Values:
Can We Harm Future People? Alan Carter
On Harming Others: A Response to Partridge Alan Carter
The Future - For Better or Worse Ernest Partridge
CITATIONS in other Environmental Values articles:
Some Theoretical Foundations for Radical Green Politics.Alan Carter
The Commons, Game Theory, and Aspects of Human Nature that May Allow Conservation of Global Resources. Walter K. Dodds
On the Moral Considerability of Homo sapiens and Other Species. Ronald Sandler and Judith Crane
This article is available online (PDF format) from Ingenta Journals. Access is free if your institution subscribes to Environmental Values. Reprints of this article can be ordered from ingenta or the British Library
Contact the publishers for subscriptions and back numbers of Environmental Values.
THE WHITE HORSE PRESS
1 Strond
ISLE OF HARRIS HS5 3UD, UK
Tel: +44 1859 520204